SPEAKER_02 43:15–46:05
So let's make the comparison between what we do and MMA. When you go way back to the first UFCs, when Gracie won three out of the first four and nobody knew how to defend Brazilian jiu-jitsu, all you had to do was get your hands on someone to eventually choke them out. It's the same thing. So after someone got their butt handed to them by Gracie, they would ask, 'I'm a boxer, but show me how to get out of this position or how to avoid it.' That's how mixed martial arts evolved. Then everyone latched onto Brazilian jiu-jitsu. Then the standup fighters came back, and now you see tie-ups and fighters throwing elbows and knees. It's just this evolution of techniques being superimposed, eventually creating a mixed version. We're the same way. You'll notice hot topics in training that everyone gravitates toward, then gets overemphasized, and then people move away from them saying, 'I don't need to do that.' But these things are important and useful when understood properly. Now we're going back to a model perspective. It's like having different models and figuring out how to integrate all that. Some integration comes through trial and error, some through experience, and some through recognizing how all our stuff works together—what's the commonality, how are things produced, how do we actually behave, and where does each piece fit? Rather than just doing a rehab-ish exercise without understanding its purpose, you have to know how it integrates into everything else. That's why I emphasize having a framework to work from—a model. We don't understand the full complexity of everything, so we need a model. But you must always ask: is there another way? Keep asking the right questions. For example, when you put someone on the ground, why are you doing it? Do you have a reason, or are you just doing what everyone else does? That usually happens. I think it's part of the evolution. But if we ask more questions about how we do things from the start, rather than just adopting systems, we can figure out what works. I can say this fits into that category, this fits into another category, and now I have a big bowl of mixed tools rather than just boom, boom, boom—which is what everyone does. Everyone gets excited about the latest thing, but it's not different. Every time you do something, you need a reason. Every time you get an outcome, try to rationalize why it happened or why it didn't. What did I do wrong? Did I pick the wrong exercise? Did I give a bad cue? This makes it process-oriented. But you must recognize that no matter what you do, you don't have the ultimate answer—you have an answer, but there's probably something better. That keeps it exciting and interesting. I'm more interested in what I do now than ever before, even after 30 years as a PT. You just have to accumulate knowledge and recognize it's a process.
training evolutionmodel-based coachingcritical thinkingmixed martial arts analogyexercise integration