Okay. So it's not related obligatorily with the gym. Like, it's not needed to have a gym to do those kinds of things.

Okay.

Um, yeah, but it's that side. It's that side of the way she's like way hunched over what she's totally fine. Like if she just stayed down there, she'd be totally fine. Yeah. She gets the right side of symptoms. Um, the other girl with low back pain is a college sprinter. Um, she was kind of someone who just like had no gradient for movement whatsoever. Um, And then she, while she had the pain with the extension also like flexion, just a very limited arc of motion both ways. I'm having more trouble with her than the first one. I'm trying to figure out like from a shape standpoint, because it's like, especially with the field hockey coach, I can like pretty much get relative, full relative motion or what I think is full relative motion within the course of a visit. It significantly reduces her symptoms.

It orients into internal rotation more than the proximal part. I love that.

Got it.

Right.

Yeah, I think I did that.

So you probably want to start out by doing a right foot forward so she can get the IR representation.

Morning guys. What is the difference between a hip shift and a hip hike? The difference is happening to one guy who shifts during a squat and that's his normal thing. As he gradually loads more weight, he starts to hike on the left side. So he shifts to the left and he hikes to the left.

Okay. So it's IR going down, right? All right. Where is straight ahead?

In the TAS example, where it was at 25 degrees of hip IR on that individual that you were just talking about, the amount of orientation that they have is not at the extreme. Whereas I had somebody that was 45-50 degrees of hip IR; that's somebody that's going to have every one of those segments turned to the right. As it ticks down from L1, L2, L3, you're getting more and more and more IR under the surface. It's the late representation coming down from the top.

Go ahead. A couple of people who are crazy compressed PR, um, using a record strategy and their very ERD would have that representation.

Okay. So you've got our middle. You think you think and I'm just I'm not I'm not passing judgment I'm just saying it's like okay so hang on so did you get into like an earlier representation do you think yes so that would be concentric yielding okay so you gave her a distributed yield That's that's efficiency of energy storage and release. So where she was before was in a situation where the connected tissues were were too stiff to promote that. And so she had to use whatever she had to create the yielding action because you still have to have it somewhere. And then she just decided that, okay, well, let's use the periosteum. Let's just use that as my yielding strategy, as my yielding action, instead of having this distributed connective tissue behavior. And so when I get the focal stress, that's why you get the pain. Okay. Cool. So do you think she's going to have to use those tissues when she decides that she's going to be a land mammal instead of a water-based animal, right? And she's going to have to bounce across the ground. Do you think she's going to have to use those tissues too?

Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Right. So as a follow up, one of the things I noticed in the videos was where they came down to the box and then leaned back. You have to de-load. You have to put pressure down. OK. That was just something we'd never done. And I saw that and I was going to agree. We'd always stayed away from any type of momentum for what we were trying to accomplish. I was trying to understand that point. What you're seeing is the load of weight onto the box to create the yield.

Yeah.

Okay. Well, yeah, I guess your head is moving back, but yeah, you're pushing forward.

Right, so we do oblique sit do the same thing?

It goes towards the cause. So when you move like this, you go, what direction are you moving? They say, well, you're moving towards me. No, it's moving that way. That's the expansion. That's the direction that the elbow is actually moving that way because I'm compressing here.

Okay. Why would you get pulled down? What would be the reasoning behind getting pulled down?

The question was whether it would be wiser to use low reaches to improve shoulder function. The intention is to get the arm overhead. To move the arm through the excursion of an overhead reach, we must have lungs that fill from the bottom up. This means the posterior lower aspect of the rib cage must be able to expand. So step one is to be able to put air there to reach overhead. In quadruped, the scapula is in its traditionally referred to upward rotation position, which would create concentric orientation of the dorsal rostral space.

I know if the flexion is in the elbow, it's the uh the occipital tunnel. If I'm not mistaken, but if it's, but if they don't feel the sensation just flexing, okay.

Thank you.

Okay. You put your medial contacts down. Okay. And you're going to be able to capture more relative motion. Okay, so you do that first, that's what you're saying, correct? Okay, so you're training the system to access certain aspects that will allow you relative movement. And then you're going to try to transfer that concept into another activity that is adding to the force production, right? So more velocity, for instance, more force. I have no issues with that whatsoever. I think it's a great strategy. It doesn't always work, but it does work. Okay. The reason I made, when I made my little smirk, when you said, when you said you got faster after the sled pushes.

Yes.

Oh yeah. It's counter-mutation, but I'm just- Yeah. Okay.

It would be me going down, going into the ground.

Right.

But if you were to look at a really good weight lifter, he would have a systemic bias of more towards yielding than overcoming just because of the rate of loading. Yes or no, it doesn't work like that.

Less of 35 year old athletes, but I get sometimes, yes.