SPEAKER_01 4:06–6:07
Good morning. Happy Monday. I have neural coffee in hand and it is perfect. All right, a very busy Monday coming up. First, a little housekeeping: invitations to the intensive 20 went out last night. So if you did apply, please check your email for the invitation. If you did not receive an invitation in your email this morning, you didn't make the cut this time, but please keep applying. Many people that have actually made it to the intensive have applied on multiple occasions. It is exceptionally difficult to pick eight people from all the applications because some of them are really, really good. It comes down to a little head-to-head thingy at the end on who's going to come. So I appreciate everybody that has the interest. Please sign up on the mentorship list at the end of any blog. We're going to try to expand a little bit of the communication through that list as well. So be prepared for that. But again, intensive 20 applications or invitations went out last night. Digging into these Q&A, this was Matt. The foundation of this question has to do with a high oblique set, but the thing that I want you to recognize here is that it's a little bit deeper than that. This lends itself to understanding that for every activity that you perform, you need to have an intention. You have to have a reason for doing it. We don't want to be random with our application. You need to understand that there is a superimposition of ERs and IRs at all times, and the setup and execution of the exercise are going to matter as one or the other will be demonstrated to a greater degree depending on your intention. So again, we don't want to be random with our applications and programming. So this is a great question for those of you that are still trying to grasp how important the setup of an activity is, as well as the execution. Thank you, everybody. Have an outstanding Monday, and I'll see you tomorrow.
exercise programmingintentionality in movementsuperimposition of ERs and IRsexercise setup and execution