Is it close by where you could just reach over and grab it?

I see. So once you like give them back like a helix of some type rather than straight. And that's, you'll, that's why you'll just like, you know, so put them in the sidelines. So they're, they're in middle P, which they don't have very much of anyway. And then that's when you'll like, you know, either, you know, from sort of the backside of the ribs or the, and the pelvis or start like bringing them. And so you'll start, you'll actually just start rolling them to move them towards early P and then the late P on that side. So they got a lot of that.

It's like a cuboid position.

So how would you reduce muscle activity enough to capture the early representations when you lie down. Is it a matter of somebody who's not relaxed enough in that position?

Okay, so you've got a shape change. And again, keep in mind this is all relative to magnitude because the magnitude of load is going to take away the ER. You're going to get a re-ER of the—again, there are relative motions that are taking place, but if you look at it from the perspective of a re-ER. So think about the counter-neutrated representation of the sacrum, okay? That's an expanded, expanded sacrum. So look at the sacrum like a parachute. It's got to expand into that counter-neutrated position.

Okay. So it would be categorized in traditional standards as plyometric behaviors.

Moving upstairs, up a staircase.

I don't think we would all come on this call if we thought that was the case, but okay. So anyway, the first woman, she was like chessboard wise. And she was on like a pretty hard turn to the right in terms of like a bird that they can mute for me please. So she was on like a term magnification of the left IRs.

Right.

Exactly.

No, it's slowing the tibia down.

Conceptually, I have a hard time understanding whether you're creating more ER or more IR.

Yes, that's why I decided I'd ask because this seems very related.

Yep, absolutely.

So if they're just forward on the left, just forward on the left, okay? They don't have the anterior, posterior compressive strategy on the right side. Okay, so they still have A to P, right? Which means that they didn't push farther to the right. So if I squeeze you on the left first, okay, that creates expansion relative to the left side, more expansion on the right. But it's A to P expansion on the right side, okay? Not lateral expansion on the right side.

Please put 15 minute consultation in the subject line so I don't delete it. Please include your question in the email. We will arrange that at our mutual convenience. Everybody have an outstanding Tuesday and I will see you.

Because there is a degree of genetic variance and morphology that affects this, but I feel like I've seen people who are very expanded below the level of the scapula, who have really thick, wide heels. And I've seen some people with really strong anterior orientations that have very skinny heels. So I was hoping you could shed some light on what exactly might be going on there.

Awesome. And then so what would be the muscle orientation?

Okay, I did not.

Yeah, Dr. Squat, yeah.

Actually, I was just thinking about it, so I don't know what I should say.

Thank you so much.

It's like- I guess what I'm looking for is what would, you know- Do you want a big bang or something?

Okay, cool. You have to appreciate that that is shape change.

Same thing.

Okay.

That's what I wanted to check. So if the problem is in the wrist, it just means that the hand is more pronated relative to the forearm.

So then, just speaking specifically to the inhale, we're like, that's what's going to be driving the expansion. Is that literally just you've put them in a position where they have relative motion available, and the breath just makes them bigger in that area, like it pushes on the bones and the joints.

And in both cases, I can create a yielding action depending on again, load position, velocity that I'm moving. So again, you have an interaction that takes into consideration many of those elements of force production.

From what provokes her symptoms the most other than playing her sport, pretty much anytime we get into a split stance position, the back leg. From a range of motion standpoint, I can get her to a point where she's pretty much clean. But anytime, even when I get the range of motion back, whenever we go back into that position, we can do a set of a split squat, but when we go into a second or third set, the symptoms always come back. I'm trying to figure out if we'll eventually have to relearn how to put force into the ground based on the fact that she's just not tolerating it. But right now, I can't figure out how to bridge the gap from on the table to getting her to stand up and tolerate this position.