SPEAKER_05 21:58–24:34
Principle supplementary training is not done in isolation from all other demands whether perceived or not. So this is one of those things that people start to throw things in; they go, 'Oh, it doesn't make that much impact,' but you might actually be creating interference for yourself. So those of you that are fond of the concept of a finisher in a workout where you're trying to kick somebody's butt so that they feel like they worked out before they walk out the door—you're doing this extra work, and you actually might be creating interference for something else if it is in conflict with the desired outcome. So keep that in mind. Principle: be comfortable with uncertainty and unknown. So again, we're dealing with complex systems; we don't know what those outcomes are going to be. And so we have to sort of pay attention to what's going on, and that's going to help us determine the next course of action. All models are principles. All models must be adaptive because behavior is an emergent property of a complex system. We don't know what's going to happen. And so we have to have a model that can adapt to the idiosyncratic elements as each individual is going to behave a little bit differently. We have concepts that we can follow. Obviously, we have constraints that we can be aware of. But again, each person is going to have those little idiosyncratic elements that the model must be able to adapt to. Principle: once movement repertoire is dependent on the ability of the body to access full excursion of breathing. So what you refer me to talk about two strategies, one plane. So universal principle is that movement takes place through expansion and compression. We do the same thing. Breathing is one of those ultimate representations of our ability to expand as we breathe in, ability to compress as we breathe out. And especially with breathing, the fluid that we're using is air, and air is compressible and expandable. So again, if we don't have that full repertoire of breathing, then the chances of us being able to move with full adaptability are slim to none because chances are we're going to be using some form of compensatory strategy. We're going to be using some form of superficial musculature that's going to prohibit our ability to fully access our movement options. Principle: there is no one best way to move. So once again, if you read the work of Nikolai Bernstein, you've read about repetition without repetition. And so under these circumstances, we're not going to be able to reproduce the same movement over and over again. So even though it might look the same, let's take a baseball pitcher for example. So they throw a baseball in a very specific manner, and each pitch might look exactly the same. What we know full well and we can actually track these things is that motions are never the same, although they are similar. So we're playing with signal and noise here where we want to minimize the amount of noise when we're talking about high levels of performance. So we can have a reproducible outcome even though it might not be exact, but there's not one best way. What we want to have is as many ways as necessary so the brain and the body can come up with a solution for any movement that would be within a specific context. Principle: neutral spine is immeasurable and unnecessary as a concept. So the neutral word is on the list of dirty words that we try not to use because we can't even tell if anybody is there nor do we know if anything is optimal. So what we're looking for is not one ideal; what we want is an adaptable axial skeleton that allows us to effectively distribute and transmit the forces that we're exposed to within a specific context. That's what's going to give us the best shot at a favorable outcome but also health at the same time. So let's get rid of the whole neutral word and let's move on to something that is more associated with making sure that we have that adaptability. Principle: any model of movement must be coherent with physics. This kind of seems a little obvious, but we have to appreciate the fact that we are part of this universe and so we must behave as such. So we have to follow the guidelines of physics. So again, when I talk about things like expansion and compression, that's a universal principle. It's like we can't deny that. What we have to do is then recognize: well, how do we respect that principle? Then we can actually have a deeper understanding of how we move. Principle: remember where they came from. So this is sort of a two-fold principle. It represents an embryological remember where they came from and then a learning-based remember where they came from. So if we can understand how we evolved in our own development, a lot of the reasoning behind how we achieve certain movement outcomes is much easier to understand. So that's why we want to learn the embryological foundations. They are underappreciated and they answer many, many of those questions. Secondly, when we're working with an individual, we want to remember where they came from. So they've already learned certain behaviors and certain strategies, and those are ingrained, if you will. And so when we're trying to make changes in someone's ability to move differently, we have to respect the fact that even though we might be able to demonstrate a change, they may default back to what they are more comfortable with, or what has been ingrained through time and experience. So we have to give them time to learn something new. And so again, when we see a regression, it's not that we did the wrong thing; it just may be that they didn't have enough time or exposure to the new information to process that and then establish a new behavioral output. Principle: movement arises morphologically due to hydrostatics and hydrodynamics in helical patterns. This goes towards what you're made of and what your structure is. So you're 99% water and 1% stuff. And so you're basically a big bag of water. You have to follow those principles. And so those are based on hydrostatics and hydrodynamics. And so that's where we want to start to push our understanding so we can get a better grasp on how we actually move through space. Principle: the strategy utilized to manage internal forces is limited and predictable within limits based on the common constraints of the system. So we have internal forces and we have external forces and we have to manage both of those. And so one of the things we have to recognize is how we control the insides matters. So we are designed such that our internal forces can behave separately from what we see in this symmetrical movement system on the outside. And so a lot of the behaviors that we'll see that produce limitations in movement or interference are actually just associated with us controlling those internal forces. Thankfully, we do have an understanding of some of the constraints of the system, and so we can narrow probabilities to where we might have some predictability as to what your strategies may be. That becomes helpful, but it's typically acquired through repetition and experience. And again, we always have to consider the idiosyncratic elements of that individual system as to how they're going to behave.
supplementary trainingcomplex systemsbreathing and movementneutral spinehydrostatics and hydrodynamics