I don't remember what I did yesterday, dude.

I understand.

Why would you lose those? Because that's important to understand.

OK.

Yeah, because that's the sort of like the most important part is to make sure you're landing in the right position, because the standing up part is a little bit easier to get to, because let's just face it, you're upright, it's easier to get to.

I hope so. I mean, on earth, like, you know, microgravity is a whole lot different. What a nightmare that would be. I don't want to go to space. Good morning. Happy Friday. I have neuro coffee in hand and it is perfect. All right, ready to dig into a very busy Friday. A quick housekeeping item: applications to the Intensive 17 will be open this evening for email list members. So if you're not on the email list, please go get signed up. Go to any blog post on billhartmanpt.com to get on that list so you get first opportunity to apply for the Intensive 17, about 24 hours before we open that up to the general public if we haven't hit our target number of applications. Digging into today's Q&A, this is with Cameron. It's a two-parter question. It started out very biomechanical, talking about the inhalation representation of the pelvis and what the orientation would be of the sacrum relative to the ischium—some constant orientation and connective tissue behaviors that allow you to distinguish how this shape is actually created. So very, very useful. The second part of the question actually transitioned into the application of my model. What my model offers is principles: it describes the how of how we behave, how we move, and then it is up to you to use your perceptions, your skills, and apply those principles in context. Ultimately, the answer to most questions is you have to find your way of how you do things, but it will be based on foundational principles. So that's the second part of the discussion—very important for you to understand as you start to work through the use of these principles. Thank you, Cameron, for that. If you'd like to participate in a 15-minute consultation, please go to askbillhartman@gmail.com, put '15 minute consultation' in the subject line so we don't delete it, and include your question in the email. We will arrange that at our mutual convenience. Don't forget to hit the YouTube channel so you can get all of these videos as they're posted up there and access the entire backlog of videos as well. Everybody have an outstanding weekend, and I'll see you next week. So, would the apex of the sacrum be closer to the ischium in a representation of an ER pelvis?

Yeah, go ahead.

Yeah.

Mm-hmm.

Okay. Yes. Right.

Okay. Let's talk this through. Give me a representation of internal rotation from proximal to distal. Is it left? It's left at extremity that he's, okay. So from proximal to distal, how can I drive IR from here to there?

So the difference would be that he has more external rotation superimposed on the left side than the right side. Or orientation. Yes. Yes. And then he's so there and then the reason that his right knee is in front of his left knee is because his left hip socket is pointing outwards to the left. And his right foot socket is still somewhat antiverted. So that's why it seems from the side that he is kind of like in this position.

Is it allergic asthma or is it induced by activity? When she exercises, does she have to take a hit off a rescue inhaler?

From just like a specific range of motion standpoint.

E-centric orientation here.

Well, I don't know if it's overcomplicated, but rather, where in the foot would that be? Like, what would it just be? Like, would that be the larger twist? Yes. Okay.

So, okay. So she definitely was not capturing IR on the rear leg. If you translate the tibia anteriorly, where did you put her?

Right. They're trying to create the yield so they can store and release the energy.

There we go. I'm making the birthday highlight real. Thank you and happy birthday. You're welcome. Thanks.

Yeah. So this is posterior lower.

So when we're pressing, in terms of the foot that's on the wall, are we not pushing very hard into the wall in that case?

I'll have to imagine it.

Absolutely. Yeah. Definitely. Yeah.

Oh, maybe, I don't know. I was just, I was just riffing.

So, I would depend on the infrastructural angle presentation, I would assume.

yeah yeah I feel like this because the quarterback position is so dynamic too. It's not like you're a pitcher standing on a mound or you're a golfer standing in a position to strike a club, right? So there's movement before the action and then there's the action itself. It's like, for example, you're a quarterback taking a drop and throw it to your left. Now you have to rotate on top of a torso that's dropping to the right, which is a whole other thing, you know, that just kind of blows my mind thinking about what we just talked about. Because you think about throwing statically, and if you already have an issue there, when it comes to balance, and control, and that center of mass, and you add a dynamic of, I like to get myself set up, and also look to see what my receiver's at whenever I throw, that's just a whole other realm of what your actual goal is in training, and also where you're at in that moment in time, where it comes to the constraints of that individual.

I see what you mean. I moved faster forward on the right and slowed down on the left.

Yes, but that's why they walk with their feet out really, really wide, right? You'll never see a turtle tightrope walker. That would be though. I would love to see that, by the way. So let's review the origin of a wide ISA archetype. Good morning. Happy Friday. I have neural coffee in hand and it is perfect. Man, what a busy week, but a good one. Wrapping up the week with a lot of stuff today. Mike Roberts and I are shooting a bunch of video for iFastU. So if you're not an iFastU member, I suggest you join up so you can actually join in the fun. We've got some great practitioners on there, great coaches, really evolving quickly. So the questions are getting really, really deep and very, very useful. So again, please consider that. For the Today's Q&A, I talked to Larry down in Texas yesterday. Really good conversation. I let him go a little long. He was the last call of the day. And so we had some fun there. You'll see it on the call. We were playing back and forth a little bit, but. What we did talk about that I think is really important is the foundational representation of the archetypes. We used specifically a wide ISA archetype that we built off of. And then we actually talked about why we have to use some form of representative model because we're managing this incredible complexity. We don't understand it. And so we have to find a way to simplify that. So we talked about that as well. So again, very useful for your understanding. So I think you'll enjoy today's Q&A. The podcast of the Week in Review will be up on Sunday morning as usual. And then I will see you all next week. So if you got questions, send them to askbillhartman at gmail.com, askbillhartman at gmail.com, and I'll see you guys next week.

Gotcha, okay.

OK.