Yeah, just like isometric core activities.

Okay.

When you first hit the ground at that point to the right.

Let me grab this.

You can move them into it.

Yes, sir. Thank you.

Okay. Once again. So here we go. Same exercise. You're squatting with a barbell. Got it? Okay. 89.7% of your 1RM load on your back. 40% of your 1RM load on your back. Same squat, same depth, which one is stiffer?

Will this be recorded for me to rewatch? It is recorded.

Okay.

I do it backwards. Okay.

See it because it's more expanded on the posterior right. And so if I squat down, I'm going to move towards expansion. That's why you get a right shift is because there's more expansion in that direction.

Relative tibial external rotation. So it's like their patellas are pointing a little bit more medial as their feet are pointing.

Yeah, so have you heard me talk about how you need this expansion of extra rotation to superimpose the internal line? So she doesn't have extra rotation in the traditional imaginary sagittal plane. So she can't go through here; she just doesn't have it. You move around here, it looks great. Okay, but we want it over here. So you're going to have to get that. You've got to get early posterior lower expansion. And so there's any number of ways to do that depending on what her capabilities are. So you're not really in this hardcore active phase yet. So what you probably want to do is you're probably just going to maybe work from sideline to try to capture that. That'll probably be the easiest place to do it. Because again, it'll allow you to work even sort of like a partial rolling activity. So it's a right side is the affected side, correct? Yes.

Gotcha. All right. That makes well sense.

You're going to do something fabulous today with her. Are you seeing her today? Tomorrow, but tomorrow. Okay. Close enough. So you're going to do something fabulous with her and you're going to pick up a ton of the art.

You know why I do these at six a.m. Eastern? Because I only want the people that care.

Well, as far as the duration, you mean?

Yeah.

As always. Thank you. All right. It's been a while.

Cause then the weight is in that second scenario. So I'm like pushing out of that.

Okay. We call it a sidebar when I interrupt your question.

Awesome. So after we capture the right foot cues, what kind of a representation would we like to induce on that left side? Yes, sir. So if I'm stepping forward with my left foot, what would touch first? Awesome. So do that for me. I want you to capture the heel first and then the first met head. It didn't feel like the other one did it.

Good question.

So this is my lead foot. So my right foot wants to go this way. And then how do you get downforce into the lead foot? We have to orient down, right? So I have to pick everything up on the backside. I literally have to pick it up and dump it onto the front leg, right? So that's going to lift the right foot up off the ground instead of dragging it through. So if I had IR, then I could go straight through. So this is, and we talk about drag marks, like the shape of drag marks, like whenever you see a curve, that's an ER, that's an ER-compensed stroke strategy. When they have IR, they go straight, like it's a straight line drag mark, right? So if I can't produce the IR on the right side for the right-handed pitcher, I have too much ER, can't push down into the ground. I have to get the weight to the front leg. It's just pick it up, dump it over onto the lead leg so the foot goes up off the ground.

So here's the, can I speak golf coach for a sec? The one thing you never want to do with a golfer is make his swing like someone else's. The thing you want to recognize is that there are certain elements of a golf swing that have to be present for all golfers to swing a golf club. So it's the spaces in between that makes them an individual, and then there's those elements that have to be there. So I need an early representation, I need a middle representation, and I need a late representation. their physical structure is going to determine how they do that. So you take a tall slender golfer and you take a short stocky golfer. They both have early middles and lanes, but they're better at certain aspects of that. And so their golf swing cannot look the same.

And that would be more for a wide ISA, I say, again it's it depends on it, it just depends on where you are because I was playing with something similar like holding onto the apex of the ISA, but could you go with the left arm over and close the lower aspect.

Other.

Yeah. They're riding. They're taking it downward. Right. Yeah. Okay. Yeah.

My original question is in respect to right oblique pelvis representations. I've been trying to think about how I can look across the gym and start to develop a triage system where I can observe people performing rudimentary gym activities and use that as a starting point to diagnose these orientations. So we're grouping some things into right oblique patterns, and I wanted to run a few observations by you to see if I'm on the right track and whether there are other things that might help with that. I'm looking at one sign I've noticed: a right shift in a squat would be one. Another is a bar tilt in a back squat viewed from behind. In the sagittal plane, we would see the bar tilted to the right-hand side, but it's likely to be slightly forward on the right as well.

Okay. And so, so when you do a mobilization of any kind, what you should be doing. So if you're mobilizing a foot, okay. Let's just say you're trying to get a midfoot pronation. What orientation should the rest of that body be in? It should be a midfoot pronation. Yeah, because you know why? Because it would interfere with your foot mobilization, wouldn't it? It's like, okay, as soon as I try to send a signal from the foot, approximately, what's going to kick back to me? Right? Cause that's what's going to happen. Like when you're mobilizing a foot, you're creating a transfer of energy into that system, right? And it's going to reflect back to you. So if I'm trying to mobilize a midfoot pronation and I don't have somebody oriented in the right body position and they're kicking back an ER wave at me as I'm trying to mobilize a foot into midfoot pronation, good luck with that. And now you know why some of your mobilizations fail because you didn't have the orientation. Right? But they don't tell you that because everything's looking, they're giving you a structural reductionist representation saying, oh, this knee is a separate entity. It does things all by itself. It's like, no, it doesn't. And then they go as far to tell you, in school, I know they told you this in school, because it's a standard rule of PT. It's like, you always go and join above and join below. And you're like, if you got a knee, you got to look at the hip, you got to look at the foot. But then they don't tell you why or how. They just say, it's really important that you look at both. And they go, okay, that's great. But I don't know what that means. What is the big deal? What is the difference that I have to appreciate in the hip if I have a knee that does this? They don't go far enough in the explanation. Right? So they appreciate what it was at regional interdependence. Yeah. I think it is the term that they give you in school. It's like they appreciate the concept, but they don't have any way to explain it to you as to its value. Right?