Right. And what would be a correction for that? I mean, what would be some activities?

Okay. So yeah, you're going to have to play with magnitude here though because again, you're not going to make that tougher too. Yeah, so you have to just consider the tissue tolerances and things like that, especially with the NACL coming back.

From what to what? I think what would be optimal would either be rolling together as a unit or rolling from prone to supine.

Um,

So you mentioned that the IR should not be delayed. So it should not be a sort of prolonged internal rotation. It should be a short moment of it. Yeah. With every sense that you want to keep them in IR, so in ER external rotation, then a very brief moment of IR and then ER again. You want to train in that? Yeah.

Where would you see posterior orientation of a pelvis visually represented in a complex activity? It would be an easy place to do.

Yes. There you go. Thank you. He's doing a whole bunch of different things. He does a jump sequence that is just ridiculous. Like he should have gotten a gold medal for just doing the jump sequence because it was so cool to see. He does Barbell side split squats. And then he does a series of like hurdle jumps and then he just keeps going and he jumps up a whole bunch of bleachers. It's just really cool to watch a gigantic human being do this. He's like a really big dude. But that is a variable representation where like the heights are different, the demands are different. So if I jump up on a box, I don't have the full yielding action of the connective tissues. And so I keep going up and up and up. So there's a different degree of stiffness than if I'm jumping over a high hurdle, jumping over a high hurdle, because the amount of time for the tissues to release is different. So again, that's looking at it from a performance aspect. It's like, okay, I want to influence this connective tissue so it behaves appropriately during performance. On the other end of the spectrum, if I have somebody that has a movement-based problem, like in my world in the purple room, I can use the variability to create the degree of stiffness or the degree of yielding action that they may need in a dynamic sense. So once we get to the point where they can have some element of control, now I take them out into the gym. Okay and now I can pay attention to rate. So if I need somebody that behaves a little bit stiffer, I might use some sort of preloading of the connective tissues, right? So that they yield and as they start to release, they're becoming stiffer and then I hit it again, right? And so now they have a normal representation of the energy storage and release of connective tissues that will protect them. Okay, does that make sense?

All right.

So with another limiting factor in regards to not seeing that presentation where we don't ever capture that early at the bottom of the squat, when you see someone that's quite strong, they tend not to be able to squat very easily with no weight on their back, for instance. You get that the ER field has been reduced so significantly because of the loads they're accustomed to carrying, tissues at tight, etc. So would that be another reason that you wouldn't see that early appear as you're describing me because I simply don't get it's not that extent.

Okay. Cool.

Yeah, it's three in the morning. So it might be tough.

OK, what does that little towel do?

So get out of here.

Yeah, exactly. But probably a bad idea. People will talk.

If I'm in late propulsion, is my center of mass in front of my foot?

Yeah.

Okay.

Okay. Um, I know I wrote you multiple paragraphs for the sake of the recording. Do you want me to recap some of that? It's up to you. This is your call. So if you feel like, again, you can just formulate a question or you could give the background. It doesn't matter to me. So whatever you need to express. OK. For the sake of time, how about I touch on some of the examples I listed in the paragraph? As far as the main question, when I just look at your model and I continue to sit with it and think about it and try to make sense of it, because it is so different from all the stuff I've learned about anatomy and biomechanics and all that stuff, it's very different. But even though it's challenging my mind, it also is resonating with a lot of other things that I've learned about the fundamental nature of nature. It's very ambiguous. Gradience is really what we're dealing with here. Things like entanglement, quantum entanglement, that all deals with this concept or exists on this idea that everything's connected. And when you talk about gradients in a joint space, ER and IR occurring simultaneously, but with varying degrees, that just sounds a lot like some of the stuff I hear particle physicists describing when they're talking about how things actually work. And it seems like your model describes how things actually work a bit better, even though it's strange. It seems to be in line with the strange stuff that seems to explain the nature of the universe the best. So that's where I'm like, I'm simultaneously confused, but also recognizing that I'm on the right track when looking at your material. My main question is how did you come upon such a cohesive model? Did you actually try to make it fit in with the governing ideas or was it just by chance? Like as you, like for example, the rib cage, when you look at the helical structure or helical angles of a rib cage, I've never heard anybody say something like that. And when you talk about how we can, the, principles that govern the structure of a tetrahedron and, you know, helical angles on the micro scale, those same principles can apply to the macro scale when we're talking about our rib cage. So that's also just shows me that you're on to something that's a little bit closer than what a lot of other people have been talking about because you're considering all the stuff that isn't just right in front of our face, you know, the less intuitive stuff.

OK.

Gotcha.

Where do you think this, so this is a, this is a sprinter. This is a hurdler. She's a, she's a really good hurdler, but she's like five foot nothing, a hundred nothing. And, but anyway, where do you think she is in this left limb? Do you think she's early or late? Can you see it?

holding that arm on that side. Like I said, start there, but make sure you're doing enough right side leading activities. And again, always with the sense that you're turning left with that right side lead. So when you talk about being in a deep squat with your left arm, with the cable forward, you're going to turn into that left side. Yeah, exactly. You want to think about making space on that left posterior aspect because then you know that you're pushing back and making the turn that you need.

It's very dark where you live, Paul. Oh, there you are.

I would imagine at school she does have access to that.

Okay. Love that. Love that. So you don't lose the heel, but you're going to move the tibia forward. Okay. Yeah. And then real simple. What do I have to, what do I have to capture on the left side?

Well, OK. So think about the foot shape that you're describing. So here's what you did. You took the earth and you tilted it up sideways. OK? So, so I just changed the orientation of the earth and then I'm going to stand on that earth with a foot. OK. What position are you actually creating with the brand?

Morning. So I'm going to restore order to the universe and ask you about an ACL patient of mine. So I have a girl back from college starting up a rehab with me over the summer, about six months out from a left ACL surgery, hamstring graft. So what we noticed yesterday is when she's doing like a bridge, I had her do single leg with a foam roller, just doing like a bridge activity. She was getting IT band tightness, like lateral knee just felt very, very tight on the left side when she was doing it, but not on the right. We were able to get it to go away immediately. I just noticed on both sides her toes and her foot were oriented into ER by just bringing it back to midline. That took away all the tightness, but I'm trying to figure out why she only feels it on the left side and not on the right. Other things of note: number one, she's someone that I've struggled to get full knee flexion and she hasn't had it ever since surgery. Probably missing about five to 10 degrees. Even when I feel like I've recaptured the motion everywhere else, I just can't get that last little bit. And then she has also demonstrated a similar lateral knee pain throughout her rehab. She has said that doing any sort of single leg hopping, not as she goes down into loading into it, but on the way back up. We've been able to get rid of that in the last two weeks just working on the proximal orientation she was using with different things, but I cannot get rid of the bridge pain unless it's literally turning the foot.

My lips are sealed.

I remember the pictures. They're pretty neat.

So, what you'll see is they sort of initiate upward and then they kick back and then they kind of stand up, right?