Yeah.

So I think my patient has also an oblique, a right oblique.

Okay. On the way up, it's just the reverse. It's like they're already down and now they need a strategy that helps them to concentrically orient more to allow themselves to push themselves up out of the squat. So it's an IR strategy in both situations. It's just different circumstances because of the exercise itself.

Okay. Yeah. So. So I'm just trying to connect like grossly through the phases, how the connective tissue moves. And in general, like the whole leg is kind of spirally oriented. And it feels like it like, or screws into the IR position and then springs out. So is the whole leg kind of moving into this like different connective tissue position as it IRs and then the overcoming, like the untwisting of it is what allows the overcoming.

Is it okay? So at some point in time, I do want to do that. That doesn't mean that it's the only solution. All right. So you do have to attend to other issues. So for instance, if I had a situation where I have a superimposition of external rotation from the pelvis downward as well as the tibial femoral external rotation at the knee, that would be the wrong thing to do because I'm promoting the reinforcement of that superimposed external rotation. Do you understand?

So if we were to do the split squat that you were talking about, you would feel a lot of relative motion after doing the barbell variation, just because it's so easy.

Okay, so I've got a question that relates to the sequencing of restoration of relative motion versus the removal of an orientation or the reduction of an orientation. So I'll paint a picture and you can tell me whether I'm on track or not or what the issue is. So let's say we've got a narrow ISA. I'm observing them doing some goblet squats with a wedge or a ramp and we're seeing some spinal lumbar flexion or expansion before they're reaching sort of 90 degrees. So I look at that and I determine that that's not ideal for what we're trying to capture. So put them down on the ground and take a look at them. They've got significant reduction in IR and they are pretty limited. We do a couple of simple sequences to reestablish some IR. At the conclusion of that, we put them back up there. We noticed that they're quite anteriorly orientated. We've managed to recapture a bit of IR. The squat goes according to plan and everything looks quite smoothly. Now, the question that I have in respect to this is that I've managed to temporarily recapture some IR, we've got an improved position in respect to the squat. But in order to really affect the sequence from what I've sort of observed previously, you sort of say to go after the orientation prior to trying to recapture any relative motion within the hip. So I'm just trying to determine, is there a downside to just doing what I just explained to you there? And if so, what is that downside?

But nobody's having that conversation with her. And you want to be straight up. You want to let her know what she's up against. It's like, if you really like to ride horses, you know, the surgery is a constraint change to take away, to try to take away the pain. It's not a solution to get her back on the horse. You want to give her a solution that's going to allow her to get back on the horse too.

I pulled it off. There you go. Okay. So this is the anterior aspect of the scapula humerus. Okay. So you're trying to do that.

Yeah.

There you go. There you go. Yeah. Absolutely. Does that help?

So would you ever use it? Like it's going to make it harder to capture the concentric orientation against that second hit, but it almost seems like it might make getting like the eccentric yield easier.

Okay, okay. So you got a lot of your IR right.

Okay. Yeah. I want to concentrically orient that tibias anterior. Don't I to get the tibia to twist inward?

So that's really interesting. How would you go about getting a performance increase? So if there is a person that wants to get, you know, you have those certain amount of rounds and you have a certain amount of time you have to last and you use a certain amount of punches you miss. So you want to have the ability to make the punch with least effort but max power, so to say, so you start with least effort and then you want to make sure that you exert the power when needed. What would be the strategies to sort of optimize that in training?

It's getting out with it.

Yeah.

So, and that's it. I guess I've, um, I've been, and maybe I'm getting too deep into it, but how much do I kind of need to pay attention to like the internal precision forces?

Yeah, you can twist stuff more and untwist stuff more. So use the aching process as a representation of what is actually possible. If I apply a low tension, long duration strategy to a bone, it changes its shape. You get somebody that comes into your office and they've got like a wicked tibial torsion. That's a low tension strategy over a long period of time. That changes the shape of the tissues, which means that they're changeable at least to some degree, which means that I should be able to turn it the other way given enough influence if I have the capacity to do so. So the baseball pitchers are the same way. They tend to throw, and Jen can correct me on this, they tend to throw a lot in their early years, and that's where they get a lot of the humoral torsion when they're very bendy and twisty in with. And then it just gets magnified to some degree as they get older. They show up in high school with the stronger, one second. They get a little bit stronger torsion through that age group, because that's where they're really starting to throw a lot with high velocity, high force. And so they'll see the changes there. But you can twist it to a degree with great turnover stealing somebody's superpowers. You've got to be careful with that.

But the greater the magnitude of load, you're going to lose the two ends. So we talk about the two ends being your ER representations, right? So let's say the early is here, late is here, and middle is here, okay? As I put more and more weight on the bar, there's your excursion. So the world's strongest powerlifter does not want to move. He moves the least amount possible. He releases the least amount of concentric orientation to allow him to execute a lift because there are rules that he has to follow. You have to move through an excursion of space, right? And he releases the least to allow that to happen. Everything is trying to stay as concentrically oriented as possible the whole time. If that's the case, you are trying to stay as close to max P at all times.

I have a concentric costal diaphragm at the same time.

I mean, and I can't remember if we posted some extreme examples up on iFastU, but you'll see these wickedness. You'll see one foot that looks like the most extreme supinated foot on one side and then the most extreme of pronation with the bunion on the other side as well. And again, those people are fighting some serious rotational forces, but they're doing it for prolonged periods, which is why you see that adaptation.

And then try to only move the shoulder and arm.

Have a great day. Have a great day.

No. Gotcha.

Yes.

There you go. Okay. So you totally picked the word right out of my head here. It's like that distance away from max P is my gradient.

Ain't no way you get a thorax that can move backwards. It's shoved forward by those two scapulae.

I don't know to what degree I can satisfy your desires here because even some of the people that are totally invested in some of this stuff have no answers. So we will try to formulate something that is useful and then maybe even entertaining for somebody else that there's probably going to be like six people that are going to be interested in this call, you know, or it's going to be like really cool. You know what I mean? It's going to fall into one of those extremes where it's like a lot of people are going to go, wow. Or there's going to be like, 62. Yeah. That's cool.

Yeah. Thank you so much.