Bill Hartman 50:10–53:02
In the past, we have that information available to us. And so maybe they've gone through some other diagnosis. So they come in with a known constraint change. And so they say, oh, I have this, this showed up on an X-ray or this showed up in an MRI. Or they're presenting with something that is mechanically familiar. So we see a relationship as we go through our relationship. And so we can identify a little bit more of the cause and effect that may be interfering with normal behavior. So again, this would be a situation, somebody fell on the ice, they go through the acute recovery, it seems to have gotten better, but they still have issues. And so now maybe they have like an adaptive strategy or an adaptive behavior that is promoting this ongoing pain. And so that's something that we can identify with our evaluation. Now we can go to a third realm here where we're talking about a much more complex situation. So this is the land of the unknowns and this is somebody that shows up with an insidious onset of buttock pain. So everything under these circumstances is going to be emergent. And so this is where we have to identify what we can identify. So we measure what we can measure, we intervene, and then we monitor the behaviors. And so This is where we see the emergent behavior, the response to the intervention, and then we would take the next logical step. So again, maybe we have some exacted behaviors here that are creating interference or not. But again, this is where we rely on our structure, our orientation, our muscle and connective tissue behaviors. And our goal under these circumstances where we start in this complex domain is we want to get moving into a complicated or even better a clear situation where we can actually apply a best practice situation because when we're in the complex domain everything is emergent. We just don't know what's going to happen because there's too many unknowns. Okay? So Tim goes on and he asks, in the physical therapist world we tend to diagnose clients with particular syndromes or conditions to do so. We often use tests which have questionable accuracy. That's an understatement. or clusters of tests to reduce the likelihood of false positives using your model. Do you solely rely on a battery of table tests to establish whether someone is in a concentric or eccentric orientation and not focus on identifying specific signs or symptoms, which would be correlated with specific musculoskeletal presentations as commonly taught in PD school. And then he says, do you try to differentiate pathology? So Tim, I'm 30 years removed from physical therapy school. I would hazard to guess there's very little that I do that is left over from that other than working with humans. So technically speaking, I do not try to identify pathologies, but my model does it for me.
constraint changecomplex domainemergent behavioradaptive strategypathology identification