SPEAKER_04 17:34–19:26
Good morning. Happy Wednesday. I have neuro coffee in hand and it is perfect. All right. Today is Wednesday. That means tomorrow is Thursday, which means tomorrow at 6 a.m. we have the Coffee and Coaches Conference Call as usual. Please make yourself a cup of coffee and join us for some Q&A. This is worldwide. We have a very international group of folks that tends to show up on these calls. The group is getting bigger every week, which is exciting. People from all over the place. So again, please join us. Always a great time. Turning to today's Q&A, I think this is a question from Manuel. And this is actually the back end of a discussion on hook lying and how we need to set up this position to be effective in our interventions. And there's a lot of common errors that are associated with this position—people not capturing the appropriate foot cues, over exaggerations of foot cues, or the inability to capture internal rotation under these circumstances. The proximal orientation is a big deal. So we'll see a lot of people that are posterior-tilting the pelvis, which is the exact wrong thing to do under almost every circumstance. This is why you end up with an outcome that shows a lot of external rotation and no internal rotation. That's an overshoot of the pelvic position. What we're looking for is an ER (external rotation) representation that we can superimpose internal rotation on. And again, a lot of people are making some errors. So we talked through some really key elements of this setup and some of the common errors there. So I think this is going to be a useful question for a lot of people. Everybody have an outstanding Wednesday. I will see you tomorrow morning, 6 a.m. on the Coffee and Coaches conference call.
hook lyingfoot cuesinternal rotationexternal rotationpelvic positioning