The Bill Hartman Podcast for The 16% - Season 10 - Number 7 Podcast
Thank you. Good morning. Happy Wednesday. I have no coffee in hand and it is perfect. All right. Today is Wednesday. That means that tomorrow is Thursday, 6 a.m. tomorrow morning. Coffee and Coaches Conference call as usual. Great groups of people. Great questions. Grab yourself coffee. Please join us for the Q&A. These have been going on for quite some time and they just keep getting better. So I'm really enjoying these. And then again, please join us. Digging into today's Q&A. This is a question with Andrew. Andrew asked some great foundational questions and I think it'll add some clarity in regards to how things are described for a lot of people because a lot of times, and especially in the literature this happens, a great deal where the point of reference is not clear and therefore the descriptions then become confusing as to, well are we looking at a situation where we have something that is internally rotated relative to something else or do we have segments that are moving together? So we used a wide ISA public representation for this to help identify some of these relative positions and orientations, and again, just to add clarity to the language and understanding. But if you also have questions about why did I say pelvic mechanics, we're going to talk about that too. So again, it's going to be helpful on multiple levels. Thank you, Andrew, for this question. It's going to help a lot of people. If you would like to participate in a 15-minute consultation, please go to askbillhartman at gmail.com. Put a 15-minute consultation in the subject line so I don't delete it. We will arrange that at our mutual convenience. Everybody have an outstanding Wednesday. I will see you tomorrow morning. 6 a.m. Coffee and Coaches Conference call. Have a great day.
ISA representationpelvic mechanicsanatomical reference pointsinternal rotationsegmental movement