Yeah.

Yes. Okay. All right. And you understand that the center of gravity is low and their first move is up. Okay.

Think about this. You got a rubber band? I'm visualizing too. You notice I don't have one. the rubber band back, right? Okay, there's going to be a point where you pull it back maximally, whatever that maximum is. So the degree of maximum in this case is relative to how fast you're going into and out of the cut. As you're going into the cut, you're pulling the rubber band back, so energy is stored. So that has to be the maximum amount of yield. Then you release it and that's your max peak.

Yeah.

And when they sit, let's leave the line to sleep. But when they sit a long time in front of a desk, is there a way to create a shape, for example, that would increase the late strategy in the right and the early in the left? And not just by this.

Okay. So hang on. So where do I need to go? Where do I need to go to get that first ray to move? You got to get the first ray to move. So you went up into the hip and you got a favorable change. Where do you have to go in the foot to get the favorable change? Do you see it? Do you see where it is? Because that's where it's not moving. So she's twisting a knee, she's twisting a big toe in substitution for the fact that she doesn't have pelvic orientation and hip motion. So she puts the knee in a position that won't bend, she puts the foot in a position that won't bend because she doesn't have the proximal rotations available. You create the proximal rotations, the knee's gonna be able to bend, the toe is gonna be able to bend. Do you understand?

It's not all the way forward.

I feel like a soft inhale, like a silent inhale kind of deal.

But that's because that should get us more yield if he holds it, right? And it's pulling everything down faster. It should give us more yielding.

Not going to be ACL questions. Get out of here. Is it an elbow? No, it's not an elbow. I've been thinking about it. So I'm thinking about the difference between a ball between the knees versus a band around the knees in a hook-lying position. So I guess it could be more than hook-lying, but just in terms of how I'm thinking about it, when I'm asking this is the way I'm thinking: I can use the ball between the knees to help increase the odds that they're not orienting into ER. But then with the band, if I get some lateral glute activity, that'll give me lateral compression at the pelvis and give me IR up top. So with this, I'm trying to think about decision-making in terms of what I'm going to give someone.

Well, I'm going to make your ground contact time longer throughout. Are you going to reach peak velocity? I'm increasing the duration. I am modifying the context to prolong the duration of ground contact. So I'm increasing your IR time and there's nothing you can do about it because I just tilted the world upright. I tilted it up and now you have to run uphill the whole time. Are you ever going to reach peak velocity?

And it's never the same length. The position doesn't change much, but the length changes as you execute the activity. So it's a misnomer and it's a misrepresentation. That's why I don't like it.

I just want to have a bit of a chat about that 400 meter hurdle that I posted on IFAST.

And bottom up for orientation, yes.

You have to be able to lower your center of mass to the ground on your heels to do a deadlift effectively.

Yes. In that direction. So coxivera would be a deformity, right? And you can see it here.

Yes.

Okay. Yeah, all right.

So you're trying to bring them back to that state so you would put the pelvis in that state.

IR.

You have to head out to college tomorrow. So she's like, I don't need that time for it.

Yeah, because my goal with either of those two movements was to create the expansion for them to access the space in the beginning in the first place. I've had success with the ramp squat, but I was trying to be a little bit more targeted and think, OK, what if I could start from the bottom up for some people and top down for others?

But not.

Well, it's a beautiful way that you put that. And I think that it's fairly universal. It's not just within the scope of physical therapy or fitness or any of those things. It really is, you have to get to the point where you realize that you're going to be okay, even if this thing falls apart. Right.

Yes.

And that's what Christian's question is all about. So it should be useful for a lot of people that are dealing with some knee issues or you have a client that has maybe a knee problem that you're trying to work around. Again, this will be very helpful. Thank you, Christian. Everybody have an outstanding Wednesday. I'll see you tomorrow morning on the Coffee and Coaches Conference call and be looking for the opening of applications for the Intensive 19 to all of you fine folks. I will see you tomorrow.

I know, I feel like Austin a little bit. My question is, I was thinking about back extensions and reverse hypers. I was wondering, would you say that with a back extension the IR is coming from the top down so that it would be more of a later representation compared to a reverse hyper where the weight is loaded earlier?

So now can we just look at her sweeping motion with the field hockey stick? And they're a little bit because if I, if I just have her do like a toe touch, she does not have any recreation symptoms feet together. Come back up, but now loaded on the front leg in like a toe touch position where she's hunched forward and then goes to push to the left leg. That'll reproduce her like the she says is mainly the tingling down the backside on the right of a right leg. Yeah.

OK, so it's still moving slower than everything else in the body, right? Am I pushing into the ground harder?

Right?