Oh, he's not thin.

Right.

My question is how do I align those two because I think basically from what I understood about that sequence in my mind, it seems like then I can have no one that I'm turning back to the right, like that I'm pushing to the right.

Zero.

Love that. Now it's going to be a shorter step, but the angles are going to be similar. Okay. What else?

Okay, that makes a lot of sense to you.

I could use the exact same exercise with a different loading strategy for a pelvic floor patient that's having difficulty capturing concentric orientation of the pelvic outlet. So again, it's just a matter of looking at this from the perspective of what muscle orientation do I need, what representation of internal to external rotation am I looking at, and then just choosing the appropriate area of emphasis in the activity. So I can't emphasize enough the versatility of using loaded carries. It's just a matter of understanding the representations of which propulsive phase you're trying to emphasize, and then manipulating loads and other parameters to remain coherent with your programming.

Okay.

Yeah, we want normal behaviors available to us.

Not just that was one point.

Okay. If you can't move the ISA, then you can't really recapture the relative motions because the relative motions demand that I have the ability to turn and change the shape of the ISA, right? Because that's how you move. That is a great representation of how you move.

How about we do this? Have you ever done a bird dog exercise?

So would you do the same thing on the right side as well? As you said, they lack middle propulsion strategies in the right foot as well, and that comes first in the sequence.

Yeah. There you go. You see it? Yeah.

That's exactly correct, sir.

Yeah.

I will look at that. OK.

Thanks, Bill. Thanks.

30 ish IR. Yeah. Okay. So my question is like when I have these athletes who look sort of similar from the side, but like they present with completely different ranges of motion. So like what's happening there?

No.

Yeah. So like a sled push is a lot closer to acceleration. As far as force production goes, then the upright high box step up, which is more top speed mechanics. So if I'm working on very specific mechanics with an athlete, I kind of know where I'm going to go. Right? Yeah.

Both sides are forward. It's just tipped up towards the right side more. That's where you would lose more rotation on the right side than you would on the left side. Because you said that you have more rotation on the left than you do on the right. If that's accurate. Again, all that is is a turn to the right. So that's my right. It's a turn to the right. And then you have to learn how to capture this turn to the left. Depending on how far forward your center of gravity rests over your feet, the farther forward you are, the more internal rotation you're going to lose on both sides. That's the determining factor as to what you need to do first. If you're tipped up on this diagonal axis to the right and pushed forward, you have to move yourself back first and then teach yourself to turn to the left. That might be why some activities to offset the left shift in your squat may still be challenging—you have to bring yourself backwards first. You have to have internal rotation available in the hip joint. We're talking specifically about where we're going to try to relocate this internal rotation. You're producing internal rotation; you're just pushing it into the ground. If we move you back, we'll get some of that internal rotation in the hip, which will allow you to create the left turn. Your strategy would be to do activities that move you back. Maybe you just do a regular heels elevated goblet squat first to teach yourself to bring your center of gravity backwards. Then you do a split stance activity with the right foot lead that will push you back on the oblique axis. You might have multiple strategies superimposed on each other based on where you are. The ultimate answer for you, most likely based on your description—if it's accurate—is that you've got a big right turn. You have to get a big left turn to come back.

Right now, I hope that answers your question for you. It gives you a lot to think about. Make good decisions. And I will see you guys too. Oh, coaches and coffee tomorrow morning, Thursday morning, 6 a.m. Don't forget that. And I will see you guys. Things are not always as they seem. So you have a precursor question that you have to ask them before you do that activity. What would that be?

Yeah. So that's why I kind of view it as like a serious alternating turn. So I see it like yielding, yielding, yielding, yielding. And then once that other side catches up and the other side has to overcome, right?

I have not.

Well, it does, because again, it's like the understanding of number one, what is represented, number two, what is the intention? And then you can fall back on your archetypes and you say, oh, so when I pick this exercise, I just need to consider how this is executed. Because the minute I put a wide guy on too steep of an angle, maybe you get a favorable response, but maybe it's not as good as it could have been. So we're talking about refining how you're executing this stuff, because we can be so much better as far as achieving the desired outcome.

Yeah, like everything's eventually moving forward over your center of gravity is going to shift forward. Everything else has to push forward to otherwise you'd fall backwards.

Okay, so that's one of my questions. Would it be different if you wanted to be lower posterior and upper? How would you set it up? Up or what? So let's just say you're going for lower pelvis. So you're looking for the sacrum to mutate, and you're looking for expansion lower posterior.

It's a useful rule of thumb because for somebody who already has the movement capability

Very helpful. Yep.