Okay. I just wanted to go over those pieces because I want to visualize it.

That's why, Dante, you ever work with somebody that's a really good jumper? No. Any man was probably had a few decent jumpers. Dale, you've had a few good jumpers, stiffest people on the planet. Stiff as people. Because that degree of stiffness is favorable because if you do deform the tissues, so if I take a really thick rubber band and I can stretch it, it stores a tremendous amount of energy to be released. Skinny rubber band, easy to deform, doesn't release nearly as much.

It's going to increase the duration that you're in internal rotation. It's going to prolong the application of the IR force. That's what you want. So you're holding the weight in a left rack, okay?

OK. All right. What's the confirmation for that?

Because it looks the same, but the difference is the connective tissue behavior is going to be different because it's leasing the energy. So again, I get this really long leg that compresses into a short leg through middle max P and then I get a really long leg again. So the ER is this expanded representation, the IRS, the compressed representation. So it goes ER compression IR, ER expansion again.

Racks. One second.

Yes. Let's talk about this briefly because I think it'll be helpful for you. When you think about the anterior orientation, let's look at the pelvis for a moment. You've got five segments in the lumbar spine, correct? They don't all orient to the same degree at the same time; it's sequential. So if we're in wide ISA with anti-orientation, the sequence goes pelvis, L5, L4, L3, L2, L1. The greater the degree of compression, the greater the degree of anti-orientation, and the sequential loss of spinal motion will occur as well. So when you have somebody with a magnified measure, like 45 degrees of hip internal rotation, that's a lot—right? That indicates someone who still has a spine that can move in some segments. When there's reduction of both external and internal rotation, which indicates significant anterior-posterior compression and anti-orientation, all spinal motion starts to disappear. This is where you get people who come in and measure at things like 20 degrees of external rotation and 10 degrees of internal rotation. Do you understand?

Oh, OK. But OK.

Yes. It sounds like that's why my, so one or two drove the other and if I can get them feeling better that they can both do it.

But you changed the center of gravity on him too.

Do you want to see my knees?

All right. And I was just seeing that forward like that. I was just seeing the relative ER of the left side, but it's probably not because they're already pushed forward. Yeah. Just as the stenosis starts happening.

Yeah, because you want to stay inside. You want your turn to be inside of your base of support, right? So under that respect, great. The pressure on the trochanter, great. The pressure through the pelvis, great, okay? Because again, it's gonna help reduce, I don't know if it's gonna reduce the orientation, but at least it's not going to promote more of it. And so that might be the buffer that you need from a training perspective that allows you to lift with less discomfort, more performance kind of a thing. So the premise is, I'm like very cool with the premise.

I'll see myself.

Okay. So I'm twisting the leg. So I have to move the leg to get the turn to go towards them.

I understand in theory, like posterior compression, hips external rotation, internal rotation, external rotation compression, internal rotation. But I want to start getting better at understanding patterns. So let's say I have a client where we did get improvement in basically every measure. She has a little bit better straight leg raise, hip flexion, and knee to chest on the left. She has better external rotation, a little less good internal rotation, and it's the flip flop of that on the right. Now she has a little less good straight leg raise on the right, a little less good hip flexion, a little less good knee to chest. Instead of like 35-40 degrees of external rotation, she got 25 of external rotation on the right, and she got full internal rotation on that leg. So now I want to start thinking about that.

Easier to capture. That's why you want to think about using the, again, if we're talking about a knee, we're going to use the lead leg on the split squat. If we're talking about the low oblique, then you're just going to drop down from elbow extended, if you will, to elbow bend.

Maybe so because let's look at the two possible extremes. They sag as much as they can with arm strength and scapular elevation and AP. Or they push really hard and they still elevate the scapula. It's like you're still looking at AP compression because the scapula is going up on the thorax, which means you have to squeeze it front to back.

In the anticipatory motor output.

The pelvic floor?

You're talking like angle of shoulder flexion?

The prone position where the knees would be a little higher, so the air drive more to the upper part of the lungs.

Jen Marchella was, you probably see the older stuff all the time, right? With the pictures. It's not as often as you would think. Maybe it was just randomly my population, but yeah. As I've seen, I don't know. I don't know how many pictures I've seen with like all their transpose. They do the older transposition. Typically like you'll see that in combo with the TJ.

I'm like, I got you.

No.

Actually it's not compressed more. She is actually so forward more, so there's nothing to stop the shirt. So her left side is more forward. So if you look at her feet, you'll see that the left foot orientation is much more significant than the right. So she actually probably measures with some measure of IR on the left hip, am I correct?

Yeah. And you'll get people that some people can't touch their toes, but they can deep squat. You ever see that? Yeah. I just said one. Alec, is that you? Can't take your tongue and drink a V-squat? OK, so chances are you're going to need some middle ground there.

Let's talk about the arm for a sec. So you're in a supine arm bar?

Okay.

I'm getting tripped up a little bit with the idea that as a general principle, if we're just looking at magnitude, increased load is going to drive a stiffer representation. But then we're talking about like a power lifter, like a really stiff person sometimes needing that load to get the yield. I'm having a hard time getting those two to play together.