Slide the two of you down.

On the specific.

Yeah. Because of the foot?

Yeah. After I get them to come back on the right and then start to make them through a more of a relative motion, um, propulsive series, right?

With a running shoe, you're basically falling through too early. If you're expressing it at all, you're getting pushed way forward, way fast.

Now I could play with the position all day long in this, in this scenario.

If she's over to the right, or if she has, she already got—no, she's on her little toe.

OK. On which side is he?

You see what I'm getting at? It's not. They're not doing this. The other side's just sort of catching up to the initial position relative to where it started.

No, because they still have to turn into the internal force. They still have to push against the stuff that's going on internally. So what you're going to end up seeing gradually is the anterior orientation is going to be greater on the left side than it is on the right side. So there's a differential between the two. The further they go, the more you're going to get the anterior orientation going up the right side as well. So again, this is why when you're on the oblique, the left side goes up, and the center of gravity shifts back towards the right. So it's turning on the oblique this way. And as they move forward, there's more and more anterior orientation on the right side. So that's why I start to lose the IR because I'm IR-ing in the spine. I'm not IR-ing in the hip.

Okay, cool. Very helpful.

Okay. So that means you have very little time to expose her to middle representations. She is going to run across the ground and she is perfect. So, how long do you think her middle will be if she's running across the ground and she's narrow as a brief? Correct. So now you know you have a timing issue. As you're trying to restore her middle representations. You would not ignore maximum efforts in force production, right? That's important, but how you expose her to that now becomes the important part of the strategy. Do you want her to do box squats with chains on the bar? No. Why not?

Okay.

So as I twist a hip into ER or IR. If you could see the tension lines in all of the tissues. So if I'm twisting a hip into ER, with the hip at 90 degrees relative to the table, I twist the hip in that outward direction and you should be able to see the tension lines pulling from the right shoulder towards the left hip. You would see it coming from the other side of the pelvis towards the left hip. You would see it coming down the left side to wrap underneath and around. So you could see, like again, you're seeing this whole, the whole system is creating this tension. That's what you're measuring. You're measuring this entire system's ability to allow the tissues to move through the excursion. Rather than just looking at this, oh, I'm moving the hip joint. Well, yeah, you are, hopefully, if that's the goal. But you gotta see that everything else is contributing to this. And then the degree to which everything can contribute determines what the movement outcome would be. So if you take your hand like this, bring your thumb into a little bit of opposition and then grab the skin right there, pinch it. Now don't let go of the skin and then try to open your hand up. It's restricted.

I do now.

Right.

Like as an eighth component of force.

Okay, you definitely have a loss of relative motion, right? The fastest way to protect the elderly population from falling is to increase power output. Power output. Now, the question is why is that the solution? And I'm not saying you don't do all other stuff. I'm just saying the fastest way. Because I can do it in a single session. If your center of gravity suddenly falls outside of your base of support, what is your response? Take a step. Old folks can't take a step. They're not fast enough. Why aren't they fast enough?

The down is the IR, right? He's going to figure out a way to go down, right? So I can anteriorly orient, but I only have so much of that. I can side bend, you know, by traditional terminology, but I only have so much of that, right? Eventually I have to pull back down to stay inside of my base of support, right? Is he doing that yet?

Cool. Would the posterior lower aspect of that pelvis probably be in an expanded representation because of that nutated sacrum? There you go. So we created the same representation in the thorax that we just had in the pelvis. So if you look at it from that perspective, now you can kind of see like, oh, posterior lower would be expanded under those circumstances. Okay. Does that make sense?

Yeah, I'm just wondering since the VISTA forum is in pronation, so is it like right to assume that I would drive supination and humorous internal rotation.

And that's the delay.

OK.

What's your giveaway for that?

I would fall on, I would break my nose.

Does that make sense?

Right? Yes, yeah. There's that part.

You're probably looking at orientation to produce internal rotation into the ground.

A lot of people are willing to go to the gym two or three hours a day to put on gigantic amounts of muscle mass because they're driven by that. It's not as exciting to just spend three hours a day trying to get a shoulder to move back. You see I'm getting that. But what if that's what it takes and just people aren't willing to do it? Like, you're giving them the best program, the best strategy. And you say, and they go, how long is this going to take? It's going to take you six years, three hours a day. They go, screw that. I'll just live with it.

So in a row, I would just play with the width of the stands as opposed to narrow as when I would play with how further apart they are side to side.