SPEAKER_03 0:00–0:06
Is where can you produce the greatest degree of force down into the ground? Well, you've got a bias towards external rotation, and a sumo would be in an externally rotated representation. So the question is, where can you produce the greatest degree of force down into the ground? If you're a narrow-stance deadlifter, your ability to capture the internal rotation position of the pelvis is reduced. It doesn't mean you don't produce internal rotation, just means that how you do it and where you do it will be different. If you were to try to lift conventional, you may not even be able to assume a position that will allow you to push down into the ground effectively. If you, like, and again, you might have a representation of this. If you're video yourself doing a conventional deadlift versus the sumo, what you'll find is that you can actually capture a better pelvic position in the wider stance just because of your—like you're more upright in a sumo than you would be in a conventional, right? And that would be advantageous for you to push down into the ground. If you have to, like, so if you sit down into a conventional deadlift and you see that, that, you know, that little rounding of your lower back, like right above your pelvis to get into that conventional position, you have not optimized your downforce. You actually have connective tissues that are in a position where they're not stiff enough and therefore you cannot push as hard into the ground. It actually dampens your ability to push down. So this requires an experiment as to what positions you can acquire most effectively. As a narrow-stance, your bias is towards more of an upright type of pull from the ground, which would be more like a squat. Does that make sense?
deadlift biomechanicspelvic positioningforce productionstance widthexternal rotation